| |
A Medieval
Well at the Asda Site, Crawley
Introduction
The town of Crawley has seen considerable redevelopment in recent
years, and hand-in-hand with this building work there have been
many archaeological investigations, a number of which have been
published in the Sussex Archaeological Collections. It is now
clear that the town was an important centre for the Wealden iron
industry in the medieval period, founded in the early 13th century,
prosperous for the next three centuries, but apparently subject
to a steady decline following the introduction of the blast furnace
technology by 1500.
The largest project to date was carried put in the 2002 prior
to the construction of a new Asda Superstore at the southern end
of the town’s now–pedestrianised High Street. Following an archaeological
evaluation of the site which identified various archaeological
deposits, a series of area excavations were undertaken which uncovered
a range of medieval features including rubbish pits, boundary
ditches and evidence of local ironworking. A full report is nearing
completion, and will be published in due course, but one feature
encountered at the site is worthy of particular attention.
The Well

The feature was a 4m deep well, originally identified and partially
examined during the evaluation of the site by trial trenching
in June 2002, but fully excavated and recorded during the subsequent
excavation later that year. The upper fills were manually excavated,
but on grounds of safety the lower fills were excavated by machine
under archaeological supervision, with the contents removed from
the well and placed on the surface of the excavated area, allowing
thorough, and safe investigation to take place.
A remarkable assemblage of artefacts and environmental evidence
was retrieved from the well fills, the lowest of which was partially
waterlogged. An almost complete anthropomorphic jug was particularly
striking as was the sheer quantity of ironworking slag used to
backfill the upper part of the well (over 20kg from the upper
fills). The evidence of the impressive ‘face jug’ and other pottery
from the features suggest a date range of 1300-1400AD for the
backfilling. The waterlogged conditions near the base of the well
led to excellent preservation of organic remains, including part
of a shoe, charred and waterlogged plant remains, charcoal and
a menagerie of insect remains, including numerous species of beetles,
various other bugs, woodworm, grain weevils, flies, ants and part
of a honey bee.

Material recovered from environmental samples taken from the
well suggests the deposition of industrial and domestic waste,
as well as the use of the feature for the dumping of cess, apparently
soon after the ‘cessation’ of use for drawing water. This theory
is given support by the nature of the insect assemblage that suggests
that the inclusion of waste began when the well was still ‘wet’.
The similarity of the environmental material from the different
fills of the well suggests the feature was rapidly backfilled,
with cess-derived remains of apple (including fragments of a core),
bramble, sloe, cherry and fig present in both samples. A seed
of caraway was also recovered from the upper fill.

There was also a range of other plant remains, both deliberately
dumped ‘industrial’ waste such as flax, hemp, and wood chippings,
and a range of taxa of weeds and other plants which would have
accumulated in the well from plants and trees in the immediate
area surrounding the well. The insect remains support the view
of partial accumulation and partial deliberate dumping, adding
the intriguing detail that some of the dumped material originated
inside a structure, as the remains of beetles who favour indoor
conditions were recovered in significant quantities.
Conclusion
The excavation of the well was a ‘first’ in the archaeology of
medieval Crawley although another well of similar date was encountered
on the opposite side of the High Street in 1995, but was not fully
excavated on grounds of safety. The part manual, part mechanical
excavation of the well at the Asda site allowed the recovery of
an illuminating range of material, combining ‘conventional’ artefacts
of interest with fascinating environmental remains. The results
clearly illustrate the potential of such features, which, although
not easy to excavate, can repay the trouble.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to all the specialists who contributed to the
site report, and whose work has been used to prepare this article
: Luke Barber, Samantha Crawt, Chris Butler, Lucy Sibun, Wendy
Carruthers, Rowena Gale, and especially to Enid Allison and John
Carrott who prepared the report on the insect remains. Gratitude
is also extended to the excavation team: Samantha Crawt, Chris
Derham, Catherine Drew, David Dunkin, Henry Escudero, Peter Ginn,
Fiona Griffin, Alex Langlands, Dan Lee, Tom Neyland, Paul Riccoboni,
Edward Wilkinson and Dave Yates.
|
|